What does the writer say about FACS being underappreciated?

What does the writer say about FACS being underappreciated?

• A. They are greatly underappreciated and seen as filler
• B. They are highly valued
• C. They are only for cooking
• D. They have no value at all

Answer: (A)

The point being tested is how the writer views the value of FACS. The writer describes FACS as not getting the respect they deserve and being dismissed as mere filler rather than as important, contributing parts. That exactly matches saying they are greatly underappreciated and seen as filler. The other ideas—being highly valued, only for cooking, or having no value at all—don’t fit because they either state the opposite (high value) or push FACS into unrelated or extreme categories not supported by the text.

The point being tested is how the writer views the value of FACS. The writer describes FACS as not getting the respect they deserve and being dismissed as mere filler rather than as important, contributing parts. That exactly matches saying they are greatly underappreciated and seen as filler. The other ideas—being highly valued, only for cooking, or having no value at all—don’t fit because they either state the opposite (high value) or push FACS into unrelated or extreme categories not supported by the text.